Media Releases

“The Doctors Reform Society welcomes the many positive ideas presented in the interim report from the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission,” said Dr Tim Woodruff, President, Doctors Reform Society, “but we wonder how their stated commitment to the principles of equity and efficiency has allowed them to ignore the inequitable and inefficient Private Health Insurance (PHI) rebate. Is choice more important than equity?”

“The belated recognition that dental care should be universally available is a huge step forward for many Australians who until now have had no choice but to live in pain, unable to eat properly, waiting years for treatment,” said Dr Woodruff. “The disappointment is that, even if the Government took the advice, those in rural and remote Australia will continue without dental care because fee for service funding will not get dentists into such areas. Denticare also guarantees that those who have the money for private insurance can get faster access. That’s choice before equity. It should be the opposite.”

“It is encouraging to see that primary health care, care in the community, is given such a high priority in this report, and that the funding for this care will no longer be spread between local, State, and Commonwealth authorities, thus potentially improving the integration of care in this sector. It is disappointing however, that there is no clear vision of how the recommended Comprehensive Primary Health Care Centres would be funded, governed, and staffed.”

“The report clearly identifies inequities in funding and recommends regional block funding for rural and remote areas, based on need,” said Dr Woodruff, “but the report ignores this issue for inner and outer regional areas where many more Australians regularly miss out on their fair share of Government spending. They have no choice.”

“Our public hospitals are struggling, burdened by inadequate Commonwealth funding. The drift of doctors from public to private hospitals and the inequity of access to public hospitals is clearly identified in the report but the contribution of the PHI rebate to this inequity is ignored. Choice remains a taxpayer subsidised option for the minority of Australians who can afford PHI and can queue jump public hospital waiting lists, whilst the most needy just wait. They have no choice. Vested interests remain untouched.”

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

]]

“The scare tactics of the Australian Medical Association (AMA) about the decrease in private health insurance cover fails to mention that any decrease in private hospital work for its members means less money for them. Perhaps that underlies their tactics but it also clearly demonstrates that the AMA believes a safety net is all that most Australians deserve if they aren’t ‘good enough’ to have sufficient money to afford private health insurance (PHI),” said Dr Tim Woodruff, President, Doctors Reform Society.

“The AMA’s scaremongering tactics, suggesting that eg patients may not get radiation therapy for their cancer treatment, is unconscionable for an organisation which claims to be interested in patients but is in fact primarily interested in the profits for its private specialist members,” said Dr Woodruff. ‘If public patients cannot access public services but private patients can, it indicates a basic flaw in our health system which the AMA supports, ie that private health should be subsidised so that rich people can have better care than the rest of the population.”

“Public health insurance is what Medicare is based on: everyone pays through taxes and the Medicare Levy, and everyone has the right to access the care in public hospitals. The AMA wants a return to the past when public hospitals were for the desperate, private care was for the rich, and those in the middle went bankrupt trying to afford private care”, said Dr Woodruff.

“It also ignores the reality that when you are put in an ambulance, you will almost certainly finish your journey in a public hospital. Destroy the public system by spending much needed taxes supporting private hospitals, and your journey could well be an avoidable fatal trip. It’s worth remembering,” said Dr Woodruff, “that the victims of the Bali bombing, many of whom had PHI cover, were saved in public hospitals.”

What is the AMA interested in, the profits of its members and their rich patients, or the interests of all patients, even the 56% of Australians who can’t afford to see private specialists in private hospitals?”

The AMA wants second rate care in public hospitals for the desperate, first rate expensive private care for the rich, a continual struggle for those in between, and plenty of private work for its members.”

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Tracy Schrader
Vice President Qld
Doctors Reform Society

]]

“The response of the Australian Medical Association (AMA) to the increase in the Medicare Levy Surcharge threshold demonstrates clearly that it believes only those Australians able to pay their doctors privately deserve decent health care. The AMA’s President today became more desperate suggesting that patients may not get radiation therapy for their cancer treatment if they drop out of PHI, is self interested scaremongering at its worst,” said Dr Woodruff. “The reality is actually the other way around. When you are put in an ambulance, you will inevitably end up at a public hospital. This is no different if you are a member of the Packer family or a victim of the Bali bombing.”

“The first Rudd budget is a move in the right direction for the public health system. It partially addresses the need for increased funding and support for our valuable public system. It also acknowledges the reality that all Australians depend on the public health system which provides a high standard of care at much more efficient levels than the private system and a step towards rekindling confidence of the public, nurses and doctors in our great public health system.”

“What is probably NOT surprising is the venom coming from the private vested interests and their false moral imperative that people who do not take out PHI or use the inefficient, expensive private system, are bludging on the public system. People have every right to pick which system they prefer without being penalised for NOT picking the system which most rewards the doctors” said Dr Woodruff. “The government is to be congratulated in its early show of sound economic decision making on health and meeting the needs of the public, rather than those of the vested interests

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Tracy Schrader
Vice President Qld
Doctors Reform Society

]]

“Suggestions that there will be further money for public hospitals in today’s budget on top of the $1 billion already promised will go some way to restoring the 50/50 Federal/State split of funding which the previous Coalition Government allowed to degenerate to a 42/58 split,” said Dr Tim Woodruff, President, Doctors Reform Society.

“The raising of the Medicare Levy Surcharge threshold is also a small signal that the grossly inefficient private health insurance (PHI) industry will not have everything it demands as it sucks the heart out of the public system,” said Dr Woodruff.

“It’s a tiny step in the right direction. It will take a maximum of $120 million in taxes from the PHI industry. That leaves them with an extraordinary sum of about $3 billion, and the vested interests are still whinging.”

“Ten years age we predicted that this taxpayer support for PHI would fail to decrease premiums, fail to unload the public system, and lead to a decline in public hospital access. We were correct.”

We now predict that this minor change will lead to the industry demanding approval for higher premiums, however unjustified, and that there will be no obvious increased burden on public hospitals because those who drop out will be low users of hospital care”.

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Tracy Schrader
Vice President Qld
Doctors Reform Society

]]

“The proposed increase in the threshold for avoiding the Medicare Levy Surcharge may well mean a decline in private health insurance (PHI) cover,” said Dr Tim Woodruff, President, Doctors Reform Society. “This will mean less tax support for the private health insurance industry and perhaps less work for private specialists in private hospitals.”

“It’s no wonder then that the PHI industry and the Australian Medical Association are complaining,” said Dr Woodruff. “They both have a vested interest in taxpayer support for the private health system which has been helping to tear the heart out of the public health system for a decade.”

“Whilst more people may now say ‘PHI is not worth it’, that’s the PHI industry’s problem. If they can’t make it a worthwhile and affordable product, even with the Federal Government’s annual 3 billion dollar subsidy of PHI, and its neglect of the public system for the last decade, they should be on their own”

“Whilst the Government’s decision appears to be based on correcting the threshold because of inflation, it really should be asking why the rich can avoid paying the Medicare Levy Surcharge just because they are rich enough to afford PHI,” said Dr Woodruff.

“Indeed, one has to ask why the Federal Government’s support for PHI which was called ‘a monumental waste of money’ by the then Labor leader 10 years ago is any less wasteful now,” said Dr Woodruff. “It has failed to put downward pressure on premiums, and failed dismally to help correct the appalling waiting times for elective surgery in public hospitals. It is so unfair on working families and on the 56% of Australians who cannot afford PHI. It’s time to do more than fiddle with thresholds.”

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Tracy Schrader
Vice President Qld
Doctors Reform Society

]]

“The report in today’s British Medical Journal suggesting that a pharmaceutical company can get a university to discourage its academics from commenting adversely on one of their products is very concerning,” said Dr Tim Woodruff, President, Doctors Reform Society.

“The company, CSL, is said to have complained to the University of Queensland about a senior lecturer’s comments on radio regarding the marketing of Gardasil, the new purported cervical cancer vaccine”, said Dr Woodruff.

“The lecturer, Dr Andrew Gunn, received a letter from the Secretary and Registrar of the University of Queensland saying it was highly likely he had misled listeners into thinking his comments were officially endorsed by the University, and that an apology to CSL was required, amounted to harassment”, said Dr Woodruff.

“The call for an apology appears to stem from the University of Queensland’s commercial relationship with CSL, said to be at least several million dollars annually, and it seems to ignore the University’s own policies on academic freedom” said Dr Woodruff.

“The suggestion that identification of one’s academic position would lead people to believe that the comments are endorsed by an institution as large and diverse as a university is laughable at best,” said Dr Woodruff. “Different views on economics, law, climate change, and almost everything else are frequently expressed in the media by academics with no suggestion that the views are endorsed by their university, The only difference in this case would appear to be the determination by the university to override its own principles of academic freedom in the face of commercial concerns.”

“The pharmaceutical industry already heavily promotes its drugs to doctors and the community through many channels including so called “educational events”,” said Dr Woodruff, “But if an institute of learning’s need for cash from the private sector influences its independence and its promotion and encouragement of open debate, it is a sign of the level to which the profession and our institutes of science have fallen. Should we be surprised given that the average budget of the Pharmaceutical companies is now more than that of many small countries?”

Dr Andrew Gunn is also National Treasurer of the Doctors Reform Society of Australia

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

]]

“The announcement at COAG that there will be a $1 billion Federal boost to public hospital funding along with implementation of transitional Aged Care places to lessen the load on public hospitals is welcome news but not enough to save our patients years of narcotic suppressed misery as they wait in pain for public hospital care,” said Dr Tim Woodruff, President, Doctors Reform Society. “We hope that this is just the downpayment on the restoration of the 50:50 funding formula between Federal and State Governments which has formed the basis for public hospital funding since the introduction of Medicare and has been neglected by the previous Government to the tune of $2 billion per year”.

“The Rudd Government’s commitment to primary and preventive care will also contribute in the longer term to a reduction in the load on public hospitals” said Dr Woodruff.

“This leaves one last striking omission from the plan to tackle the problems in public hospitals however,” said Dr Woodruff. “Doctors are exiting the public hospital system in favour of the taxpayer funded private hospital industry, leaving public hospitals in the impossible situation where, even with the extra resources promised through COAG, there will not be enough specialists left in the public system to treat our patients.”

“The private hospital industry, funded through the $3 billion Private Health Insurance (PHI) rebate, has grown substantially since 1999, and this growth requires specialists,” said Dr Woodruff. “The only place they can come from is the public hospital sector. Until this is addressed by consideration of the injustice and inefficiency of the there will continue to be a shortage of specialists in public hospitals next door to fully staffed private hospitals”.

“The ongoing Federal Government taxpayer support of the private system means our patients will continue to wait years for surgery in the public system whilst their neighbours with taxpayer funded PHI are treated within weeks. It’s not fair,” said Dr Woodruff, “indeed it is positively dangerous for all Australians who, privately insured or not, rely entirely on the public hospital system in an emergency or for chronic and life threatening illness or injury. The least the Rudd Government should do is to ask the Health and Hospitals Reform Commission to closely analyse how unfair and inefficient the PHI rebate really is.”

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Tracy Schrader
Vice President Qld
Doctors Reform Society

]]

“The announcement of another 4.99% increase in Private Health Insurance (PHI) premiums is another blow to Australians struggling to pay for basics such as food and petrol and rising interest rates. Its also means another $180 million in taxes gifted to the private hospital industry (through the PHI rebate) to promote queue jumping for those Australians fortunate and/or desperate enough to afford Private Health Insurance,” said Dr Tim Woodruff, President, Doctors Reform Society.

“Whilst public patients wait years even to see a specialist at a public hospital, let alone get an operation, taxes are used to help those with PHI go private within weeks of deciding they need their operation.”

“What do I say to my patient whose hip needs replacing?, asked Dr Woodruff. ‘Go home, take some painkillers, get a walking frame, and get used to limping and not sleeping’, or ‘Go home, stop spending money on anything except basic food and shelter, and save up for PHI so you too can jump the queue.”

“How have we come to this,” asked Dr Woodruff, “that nearly $3 billion in taxes are spent every year to prop up such an unfair system which bleeds taxpayers, feeds the private health industry, and leaves our most needy in preventable pain for years.”

“Poor working families and the many pensioners and health care card holders who will never benefit from PHI should be asking the new Federal Government how this terrible injustice can be endorsed by a party which prides itself on an interest in working families. All Australians who end up needing a public hospital in an emergency such as a heart attack, major MVA etc are losing out under the current system of large public subsidy to the inefficient private health insurance system”

Dr Tim Woodruff
President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Con Costa
Vice President
Doctors Reform Society

Dr Tracy Schrader
Vice President Qld
Doctors Reform Society

]]