HOME

SEARCH

RESOURCES

FORUM

CONTACT

 

Private Health Insurance Rebate  Increased For The Elderly

 

Sad, bad news

 

The Howard announcement that the private health insurance rebate will be increased for the elderly is sad and bad news for all those dependent on the under funded public hospital and public health system. It means another $445 million in taxes not available to be spent getting GPs to visit patients in nursing homes, being available after hours, or simply being available in some suburbs. More doctors and nurses will leave the understaffed public hospitals to work in the already more lucrative private hospital system.

Fifty six percent of Australians can’t afford private health cover, and are wholly dependent on the public system. All those Aussie battlers are being ignored as the Government continues to use taxes to support the grossly inefficient private health industry where it costs twice as much to get an operation done than in the public system.

This is economically irresponsible use of taxpayers money and grossly discriminatory against the majority of Australians.

 

Published in The Age 24/8/04

Dr Tim Woodruff

President

Doctors Reform Society

 


Rebate for oldies: just a political bribe

 

Health Minister Tony Abbott's increased subsidy to private insurance for the elderly (The Age, 23/8) is a transparent political bribe. It does nothing for those without insurance and provides an illusion of security for those with insurance. A decent response would have been to solve the problem of equitable access to health care for all of us.

The reason elderly people maintain private health insurance is mostly so that they can get care when they need it. They know that elective surgical or medical care in the public system may involve long waits, wasting time and quality of life that they cannot spare. This is in large part because of the progressive running down of this system over some years by this Federal Government.

Private for-profit health care has been shown to be more expensive and to be associated with higher deaths and complications than public care. One only has to look at the United States to see this. It is a system that is good for health-care providers, but appalling for patients. Why should our community be pushed into an inferior system?

 

Published in The Age 24/8/04
Andrew Watkins Hampton

 


Letters Index


[ Doctors Reform Society of Australia home page]
[ About DRS ] [ Search ] [ What's New ]
[ Policies ] [ Media Releases ] [ Published Letters ]
[ Online articles ]
[ New Doctor: Journal of the DRS ]
[ Discussion Board ] [ Contacting DRS ] [ Joining DRS ] [ Links ]